The numbers question really addresses where the industry has been, not where it is now, and where it is going
Pre-Weavering, the number of directorships was genuinely held as being indicative of director performance not any more. In an increasingly sophisticated industry post-crisis, stakeholders dont want to know about mere directorship numbers. They want to go in-depth, and understand exactly how the governance process is working for their fund.
Providing a far more qualitative approach than the DDQ approach that was so popular many years ago, DMS truly saw ahead of the curve, and was ready and waiting for the industrys approach to governance to change.
It is well accepted today that the due diligence process cannot be reduced to a single question
The numbers question really addresses where the industry has been, not where it is now, and where it is going
Pre-Weavering, the number of directorships was genuinely held as being indicative of director performance not any more. In an increasingly sophisticated industry post-crisis, stakeholders dont want to know about mere directorship numbers. They want to go in-depth, and understand exactly how the governance process is working for their fund.
Providing a far more qualitative approach than the DDQ approach that was so popular many years ago, DMS truly saw ahead of the curve, and was ready and waiting for the industrys approach to governance to change.
It is well accepted today that the due diligence process cannot be reduced to a single question